UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds
Advocate Cindy Blackstock is giving Canadians suggestions for better ways to refer to first peoples. (Credit: Cindy Blackstock/Facebook)

Cindy Blackstock is quietly teaching Twitter how to refer to the first peoples in Canada

The advocate is targeting those in the media and anyone who wants to join these conversations, but doesn't know how.

By Amy van den Berg

Gitxsan advocate Cindy Blackstock is helping Canadians have important conversations about Indigenous peoples, one word at a time.

Since Saturday, she has been posting daily tweets that aim to give her nearly 30,000 followers alternate words to refer to First Nations, Métis and Inuit people, along with explanations about why using the wrong language is harmful.

“I run into people all over the country and I see caring Canadians really trying to have these conversations, but not being sure about how to find the words,” Blackstock said about why she decided to post the tweets. “It’s an easy way to provide one idea per day on how people can change their language so it’s less colonial and more reflective of reconciliation.”

Blackstock has worked in social work and Indigenous rights for decades, and has been called Canada’s ‘relentless moral voice’ for First Nations equality. A professor at the school of social work at McGill, Blackstock said the tweets are directed towards any person who wants to join these conversations but doesn’t know how.

She said she plans to post one tweet a day until she hits 10 to 15 words. At the top of her list is the word “healing,” which she wrote “reinforces the savage/civilized dichotomy that underpins colonialism.”

“I don’t like categorizing an entire group of people as recovering from illness,” she said. 

At a time when Canada is struggling to figure out what reconciliation means, using the correct wording has never been so important. Canada has improperly referred to First Nations peoples throughout its history, beginning with the arrival of settlers who believed they had reached India. The word "Indian" stuck and lives on via the 1876 Indian Act and in conversation.

Indigenous relations trainer Bob Joseph wrote in a 2016 CBC opinion piece that using the right terminology isn't about Canadians' comfort levels. “It's about showing respect and using the term that individuals and organizations have chosen for themselves.”

Joseph also asked Canadians to not use the possessive phrase “Our Indigenous Peoples,” or “Canada’s First Nations,” a sentiment Blackstock echoed.  

In another tweet, she suggested avoiding the use of words like “vulnerable,” and “marginalized” when speaking about first peoples of Canada, since they codify and generalize the situation. Rather, she recommends describing individuals as living with structural risk.

Canadians should also be mindful of “Indigenous”—a collective noun for First Nations, Inuit and Métis—since it bunches multiple diverse groups together. Blackstock said. Both media and the government have adopted this word in favour of Aboriginal, but often, she said, people use Indigenous when they could refer to individual communities or groups.

This is something Blackstock says is damaging to communities. “It reinforces the mental frame of colonialism.”


Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!

Columns

(Photo: cuatrok77/Flickr via Creative Commons)

Cormorants aren't the devil

by Douglas Hunter

Ontario's proposed new measures amount to a slaughter of an entire native bird species for no scientifically compelling reason, says this writer

Promotional Image

Editorials

The United Church Observer's editor and publisher, Jocelyn Bell. (Photo: Lindsay Palmer)

The new name of 'The Observer' revealed!

by Jocelyn Bell

"United Church" will no longer be on the cover, but our commitment to sharing denominational news and perspectives remains the same

Promotional Image

Video

Meet beloved church cats Mable and Mouse

by Observer Staff

They're a fixture of Kirk United Church Centre in Edmonton.

Promotional Image

Society

February 2019

Marriage problems: Is the ancient tradition worth saving?

by Pieta Woolley

Bitterness and boredom seem to define many mid-life marriages, but we might not have to settle for apathy ever after

Ethics

February 2019

A Yukon artist and a Tlingit trapper create this stunning jewelry

by Amy van den Berg

The fur jewelry in Whitehorse boutique store V. Ægirsdóttir is creating a new possibility for future partnerships with the region's trappers

Columns

February 2019

Why white people need to stop asking, 'where are you from?'

by Mike Sholars

"...For all intents and purposes, Canada is the only home I really recognize or remember. But none of that matters if I look like I don’t belong, and that single question makes that abundantly clear every single time."

Promotional Image