UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds
Trinity Western University in Langley, B.C. (Credit: Google Maps)

Trinity Western’s community covenant move has to be followed by meaningful change

A queer Christian shares what she wants to see happen after the school made its controversial pledge optional for students.

By Jenna Tenn-Yuk

After two Supreme Court of Canada challenges, Trinity Western University (TWU) in B.C. has decided to drop its controversial community covenant for students. This contract calls on people to abstain from sex outside of heterosexual marriage and was at the centre of the recent Supreme Court case.

The court ruled in June that British Columbia and Ontario’s law societies can refuse accreditation based on TWU’s covenant, saying that the policy would cause significant harm and discourage LGBTQ+ students from attending its proposed law school.

The university’s board of governors recently voted to make the covenant optional for students to sign, citing their desire for an “inclusive” community of “all students wishing to learn from a Christian viewpoint and underlying philosophy.”

This might seem like a huge victory for LGBTQ+ students and allies at the Christian university, and those wishing to attend. However, faculty, staff and administrators will still have to sign the covenant. This distinction raises many questions and concerns for me.

It would be naive to believe there are no faculty and staff who are on the LGBTQ+ spectrum or disagree with the pledge. This is challenging for those who have to stay silent or risk losing their jobs.

Also, it matters to see representation of and support for LGBTQ+ people in leadership positions. As a queer woman of colour, it has been important to see leaders who look like me and have similar lived experiences.

Who can queer, trans and non-binary students, who have limited representation and connection, turn to for support around their sexual orientation and gender identity?

One TWU, a community of LGBTQ+ students, alumni and allies at TWU, is a great resource. Faculty and leadership would also ideally provide support. However, what about staff or members of the administration who believe that being queer and trans are against Biblical teachings? Their beliefs and assumptions are ingrained in how they teach, support students and make policy.

How will the school create safer spaces for LGBTQ+ students to explore who they are without fear of judgment and shame?

"Is TWU really standing for the 'value of each member' or just hoping this change will allow them to have Canada’s first faith-based law school?"

It is also troubling that the president of TWU, Robert Kuhn, sent mixed messages in his statement about making the covenant optional for students. TWU claims it can remain a “biblically-based” university “fully committed to our foundational evangelical Christian principles… while simultaneously welcoming and affirming the unique value of each member of our diverse student body.”

How can it welcome and affirm each student when the covenant says that being queer and trans are not in line with its evangelical Christian principles? Why can’t TWU recognize how harmful this covenant is? 

Those at the centre of this issue — queer and trans people — aren’t named in the statement, or even the covenant. This is an empty gesture. Without action, deep-rooted beliefs and biases won’t change.

What kinds of steps will TWU take following this move? Will there be mandatory workshops to understand the experiences of LGBTQ+ people and how to create affirming spaces on campus? Is TWU really standing for the “value of each member” or just hoping this change will allow them to have Canada’s first faith-based law school?

The entrenched homophobia and transphobia in Christian communities and the church run deep, without many people even realizing it. If the entire community isn’t engaged in this change — including recognizing the problems in the covenant itself — I don’t see how TWU can truly become a “welcoming” and “affirming” space for LGBTQ+ people.

Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!


Promotional Image


The Observer has a bright future ahead

by Jocelyn Bell

Change is as vital to the publication's history as our founding Christian values are to our future, says editor and publisher Jocelyn Bell.

Promotional Image


Meet beloved church cats Mable and Mouse

by Observer Staff

They're a fixture of Kirk United Church Centre in Edmonton.

Promotional Image


January 2019

Where to donate your unwanted stuff so it actually goes to those who need it

by Glynis Ratcliffe

It may be tempting when you declutter to just drop off all your items at Value Village, but sticking with local organizations is a better option.


January 2019

Former fundamentalists describe the trauma of leaving their faith

by Anne Bokma

At a weekend retreat, participants find the strength to reclaim their lives.


January 2019

I worry the United Church doesn't want evangelicals like me

by Marilyn Myhre

While the church community says it accepts everyone, one woman wonders if that is still true.

Promotional Image