UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds

Observations

The outlaws of cyberspace

By David Wilson

Today began with an email stating that someone had tried to log in to my bank account using incorrect information; I wouldn’t be able to access my account until I clicked on a link at the bottom of the message. The day ended with a robocall congratulating me on winning 9,999 Canadian Tire dollars that I could collect by pressing “1” now.

It was pretty obvious that both were scams. The message from the bank looked authentic, but the syntax was a dead giveaway: “Within [bank’s name] latest security checks, we recently discovered that today there were 3 incorrect login attempts to your account.” The Canadian Tire windfall? The voice on the other end of the line has previously called to congratulate me on winning free airline credits and cruises to the Bahamas.

It was actually a pretty slow day for scams. Most days my inbox and voicemail are full of them. No doubt yours are too — someone fishing for credit card information, offering to fix a problem for a computer you don’t own, announcing a million-dollar windfall, or warning that you could go to prison if you don’t respond to the sender immediately. The list is endless.

Cybercrime is spreading like a runaway pathogen. The 2013 Norton Report released by computer security giant Symantec estimated that the global cost of cybercrime had hit US $113 billion a year and was affecting one million people every day. The study showed that the cost of cybercrime in Canada had doubled to $3 billion in just one year, and that seven million Canadians had been victims.

Seven million? That’s about 20 percent of the population. Norton defines cybercrime in broad strokes because it sells products to defend against it. So its definition ranges from attempted scams to serious offences such as identity theft. Still, if seven million Canadians a year were victims of, say, a minor crime such as pickpocketing or even attempted pickpocketing, I’m pretty sure we’d demand that our law enforcement agencies hit back. Curiously, though, we’re blasé: no one likes to be targeted by scammers, but on the whole we tolerate it. We invent harder-to-hack passwords, cleanse our hard drives and learn to be cyber savvy.

The Internet is like a recently discovered continent, full of riches but also chaotic and dangerous. Seemingly, we accept lawlessness as a fact of frontier life and aren’t yet willing to run the outlaws out of town. But with cybercrime spreading unchecked — Norton estimates that it affects 18 people a second worldwide — the day may not be far off.

The Internet is already nominally regulated. Is increased regulation the answer to cybercrime? How much do you limit individual freedoms in order to fight criminal misuse of the Internet? These are values-based questions we should be asking now. But on the whole we’re not, nor are our government leaders. The 13-year-old UN Convention on Cybercrime has proven largely toothless. More recently, a 2012 UN telecommunications treaty gave governments more clout to combat cybercrime. But Canada and several other western nations snubbed it, citing mainly ideological reasons.

Unlike the geographic continents, no one can really claim sovereignty over the Internet. That’s partly why it’s so lawless and why it’s so rich with promise — ideally, it belongs to everyone, and ideally the global community will decide how it develops. I hope we can eventually agree that it should be a place that embodies humanity’s better instincts. It would be a crime to allow it to become the domain of scoundrels.  


Author's photo
David Wilson is the editor-publisher of The Observer.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

Enclaves of the elderly

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: A shoulder to lean on

by Observer Staff

Sheima Benembarek was born in Saudi Arabia, grew up in Morocco and moved to Canada in 2005. In 2015, she relocated to Toronto. At first, the city seemed so much bigger, impersonal — and even threatening — until a fateful encounter in the subway one day.

Promotional Image

Faith

January 2017

Presbytery turns down bid to halt Vosper hearing

by Mike Milne

World

February 2017

Many faces, one humanity

by Wade Davis

The words and photographs of the Canadian author and explorer capture the richness — and fragility — of global cultures and rituals

Society

February 2017

An anatomy of hate

by Douglas Tindal

It’s on the rise everywhere. The writer explores our most troubling emotion and asks how we might overcome it.

World

February 2017

Many faces, one humanity

by Wade Davis

The words and photographs of the Canadian author and explorer capture the richness — and fragility — of global cultures and rituals

Society

January 2017

The new agrarians

by Lois Ross

In the next 15 years, almost half of Canadian farms will change hands. Meet seven millennials who view agriculture as a career — and moral calling.

Faith

March 2016

The Walrus Talks Spirituality

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image