UC Observer logo
UCObserver on SoundCloud UCObserver on YouTube UCObserver on Facebook UCObserver on Twitter UCObserver's RSS Feeds
Syrian refugees cross from Hungary into Austria on their way to Germany in September 2015. Photo by Mstyslav Chernov/Wikimedia Commons

Suppressing our better angels

Racism rears its head in the Canadian election

By Dennis Gruending


The main issue in the Canadian election was supposed to be who could best manage the economy. Prime Minister Stephen Harper claims that it's he, and warns that other political parties will run deficits and raise taxes. Of course, Harper ran six deficits in a row. Apparently, he runs good deficits, and it would be irresponsible for others to do the same.

The Conservatives, however, have also introduced a much darker anti-Muslim dimension into the campaign. For them, the arrival of hundreds of thousands of Middle Eastern refugees in Europe this summer and fall was opportune. While many Canadians were meeting in city halls and churches to discuss how to assist in the humanitarian crisis, the Conservatives used the same crisis to spread fear.

Simply put, Harper played on fears about terrorism, claiming that other political parties would airlift refugees to Canada from camps in a volatile zone. Among those people, he warned, there could well be terrorists who want to harm Canada. This was a straw man monologue because no other political leaders suggested an air lift of undocumented people. They were asking, however, why it takes years for the Canadian government to process refugees lingering in the camps when there are Canadian sponsoring groups who want to receive them.

Harper also indicated that Canada will select its refugees from among persecuted minorities. That's code language that means Canada will accept Christians — and perhaps some Yazidis — but not Muslims. Tragically, it's true that Christians are being persecuted in the region, but the vast majority of victims and refugees continue to be Muslims.

In addition, the Conservatives have deliberately stirred up controversy over a Federal Court ruling that said it is against the law for the government to ban women from wearing the niqab, which is a facial scarf, at citizenship ceremonies. The prime minister and former Immigration Minister Jason Kenney are rarely accused of being feminists but in this case, they argue that women who wear the niqab are oppressed.

Then there's the recent news conference featuring ministers Chris Alexander and Kellie Leitch. The two promised that if re-elected, the Conservatives will set up a telephone snitch line so that people can report to the RCMP any “barbaric cultural practices” that they might notice, including polygamy, forcing children into arranged marriages and honour killings. Without question, this is a neighbourhood watch with an Iron Curtain feel to it. CBC reporter Neil Macdonald writes that the Conservatives are attempting to implant in the public mind the harshest interpretations of fundamentalist Islam.

More recently, Harper has moved even farther into inciting division, saying that his government would also consider banning public servants from wearing the niqab, even though virtually none of them do!

Earlier generations of parliamentarians stoked fears against South Asians, slapped a head tax on Chinese immigrants, interned Japanese and Ukrainian Canadians, and fueled prejudice against Indigenous peoples. It was left to politicians in succeeding generations to apologize for the bigoted actions of their predecessors.     

In 1861, U.S. President Abraham Lincoln expressed the fond hope that Americans would be led by the “better angels of [our] nature.” That’s also a fitting hope for Canada’s election campaign in 2015.


Author's photo
Dennis Gruending is an Ottawa-based author, blogger and a former Member of Parliament. His work will appear on the second and fourth Thursday of the month. His Pulpit and Politics blog can be found at www.dennisgruending.ca.
Readers’ advisory: The discussion below is moderated by The UC Observer and facilitated by Intense Debate (ID), an online commentary system. The Observer reserves the right to edit or reject any comment it deems to be inappropriate. Approved comments may be further edited for length, clarity and accuracy, and published in the print edition of the magazine. Please note: readers do not need to sign up with ID to post their comments on ucobserver.org. We require only your user name and e-mail address. Your comments will be posted from Monday to Friday between 9:30 a.m. and 5:30 p.m. Join the discussion today!
Promotional Image

Editorials

David Wilson%

Observations

by David Wilson

Enclaves of the elderly

Promotional Image

Video

ObserverDocs: A shoulder to lean on

by Observer Staff

Sheima Benembarek was born in Saudi Arabia, grew up in Morocco and moved to Canada in 2005. In 2015, she relocated to Toronto. At first, the city seemed so much bigger, impersonal — and even threatening — until a fateful encounter in the subway one day.

Promotional Image

Faith

January 2017

Presbytery turns down bid to halt Vosper hearing

by Mike Milne

World

February 2017

Many faces, one humanity

by Wade Davis

The words and photographs of the Canadian author and explorer capture the richness — and fragility — of global cultures and rituals

Society

February 2017

An anatomy of hate

by Douglas Tindal

It’s on the rise everywhere. The writer explores our most troubling emotion and asks how we might overcome it.

World

February 2017

Many faces, one humanity

by Wade Davis

The words and photographs of the Canadian author and explorer capture the richness — and fragility — of global cultures and rituals

Society

January 2017

The new agrarians

by Lois Ross

In the next 15 years, almost half of Canadian farms will change hands. Meet seven millennials who view agriculture as a career — and moral calling.

Faith

March 2016

The Walrus Talks Spirituality

by Observer Staff

Promotional Image